Wisniewski v. Nawrocki

116 N.W. 1065, 153 Mich. 523, 1908 Mich. LEXIS 1061
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1908·No. Docket No. 19·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Moore, J.

The complainant is a carpenter and filed a bill in chancery to enforce a lien for work done by him upon a building erected by defendant. After establishing his lien, his solicitor showed to the court the following items of costs incurred in establishing it:

Lien fee..... $0 75
Lis pendens .. 75
Entry fee____ 5 00
Witness fees . 3 30
Stenographer 4 00
Decree -...... 7 00
$20 80

A decree was rendered for the amount of complainant’s lien but allowing him, against his protest, but $5 as costs.

The case is brought here by appeal. It is the claim of complainant that he should have been allowed his actual disbursements and a reasonable solicitor’s fee. Sections 10721,10730, and 10736, 3 Comp. Laws, contain provisions which apply to this proceeding. The complainant was compelled to resort to the court to obtain his relief. He established his right to a decree. We think he should have been allowed his actual disbursements and a reasonable amount for his solicitor, which amount, in view of the small amount involved here and the comparatively small amount of work required of the solicitor, we fix at the sum of $40 for both courts.

A decree may be prepared in accordance with this opinion.

Grant, C. J., and Blair, Carpenter, and McAlvay, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wisniewski v. Nawrocki, 116 N.W. 1065, 153 Mich. 523, 1908 Mich. LEXIS 1061 (Mich. 1908).

116 N.W. 1065 (Wisniewski v. Nawrocki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

River Rouge Savings Bank v. S & M Building Co.
101 N.W.2d 260 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1960)
Peter Mintener Lumber Co. v. Janisch
181 N.W. 914 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1921)
Grace Harbor Lumber Co. v. Ortman
157 N.W. 96 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1916)