Wisman, Exr. v. Hill

Ohio Supreme Court

Wisman, Exr. v. Hill

181 N.E. 895, 124 Ohio St. 647, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 647, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 295

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 10, 1931

Docket22450

StatusPublished

This text of 181 N.E. 895 (Wisman, Exr. v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wisman, Exr. v. Hill, 181 N.E. 895, 124 Ohio St. 647, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 647, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 295 (Ohio 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

*648 It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed by the concurrence of six Judges, to-wit, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ. Inasmuch as four or more judges concurring in such judgment do not agree upon the grounds upon which such judgment should be placed, no authoritative opinion is filed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*648 It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed by the concurrence of six Judges, to-wit, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ. Inasmuch as four or more judges concurring in such judgment do not agree upon the grounds upon which such judgment should be placed, no authoritative opinion is filed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 N.E. 895, 124 Ohio St. 647, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 647, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wisman-exr-v-hill-ohio-1931.