Wishon v. Gastonia Weaving Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Wishon v. Gastonia Weaving Co.

220 N.C. 420

DecidedNovember 26, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 220 N.C. 420 (Wishon v. Gastonia Weaving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wishon v. Gastonia Weaving Co., 220 N.C. 420 (N.C. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

WiNBORNE, J.

It appearing from the alleged agreement upon which the action is based that Co-operative Fellowship Club is designated the bargaining agent for all the employees of defendant paid on an hourly or piecework basis, and that plaintiff was employed on weekly basis, the demurrer was properly sustained.

Attention is called to Rule 22 of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, 213 N. 0., 808, which provides that in pauper appeals “nine legible” typewritten copies of transcript and brief may be filed. This is mandatory. Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 155 S. E., 924.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WiNBORNE, J.

It appearing from the alleged agreement upon which the action is based that Co-operative Fellowship Club is designated the bargaining agent for all the employees of defendant paid on an hourly or piecework basis, and that plaintiff was employed on weekly basis, the demurrer was properly sustained.

Attention is called to Rule 22 of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, 213 N. 0., 808, which provides that in pauper appeals “nine legible” typewritten copies of transcript and brief may be filed. This is mandatory. Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 155 S. E., 924.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 N.C. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wishon-v-gastonia-weaving-co-nc-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack