Wishom v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wishom v. State

881 S.W.2d 631, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 893, 1994 WL 240874

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 1994·No. No. 64378·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking credit for jail time served. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking credit for jail time served. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Wishom v. State, 881 S.W.2d 631, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 893, 1994 WL 240874 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

881 S.W.2d 631 (Wishom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.