Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Wishograd v. Starrett City, Inc.

Wishograd v. Starrett City, Inc.

225 A.D.2d 617, 639 N.Y.2d 730, 639 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2159
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 11, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D.2d 617 (Wishograd v. Starrett City, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wishograd v. Starrett City, Inc., 225 A.D.2d 617, 639 N.Y.2d 730, 639 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate an order dismissing the complaint for failure-to appear at a pretrial conference. The plaintiffs failed to offer a reasonable excuse for failing to appear for the scheduled conference, and they did not demonstrate the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see, Blumberg v State of New York, 208 AD2d 581; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is not preserved for appellate review and is, in any event, without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Putney v. Pearlman
203 A.D.2d 333 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Blumberg v. State
208 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 617, 639 N.Y.2d 730, 639 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wishograd-v-starrett-city-inc-nyappdiv-1996.