Wishinsky v. Warren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wishinsky v. Warren

257 A.D. 889, 12 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8296

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 889 (Wishinsky v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wishinsky v. Warren, 257 A.D. 889, 12 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment recovered by defendants on a counterclaim in the Oneonta City Court, which was affirmed by the Otsego County Court. The action was brought by plaintiff for damages alleged to have arisen because of the breach of a contract to repair a tractor so it would be “ as good as new.” The evidence supports the decision dismissing the complaint, and the judgment on the counterclaim, which was founded upon a promissory note of which plaintiff was the maker. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment recovered by defendants on a counterclaim in the Oneonta City Court, which was affirmed by the Otsego County Court. The action was brought by plaintiff for damages alleged to have arisen because of the breach of a contract to repair a tractor so it would be “ as good as new.” The evidence supports the decision dismissing the complaint, and the judgment on the counterclaim, which was founded upon a promissory note of which plaintiff was the maker. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 889, 12 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wishinsky-v-warren-nyappdiv-1939.