Wishek v. Hildenbrand

North Dakota Supreme Court

Wishek v. Hildenbrand

204 N.W. 364, 52 N.D. 672, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 135

North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided May 2, 1925·Published

Opinion

Burke, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, under chapter ll¿ of the Session Laws of 1923, to disconnect 160 acres of land belonging to the plaintiff from the city of Ashley in the county of McIntosh and State of North Dakota. The petition, proof of hearing of .petition before the city council, decision of tire city council, and the decision of the judge of the district court on certiorari, are in all things tic same as in the case of Enderson v. Hildebrand, ante, 533, decided at this term, and which decision governs and controls the decision in this case. The decision of the lower court on certiorari is in all things affirmed.

hbtstiaNsoN, Oh. J., and Birukeel, JoiiNsoN, and Nuessue, JL, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, under chapter ll¿ of the Session Laws of 1923, to disconnect 160 acres of land belonging to the plaintiff from the city of Ashley in the county of McIntosh and State of North Dakota. The petition, proof of hearing of .petition before the city council, decision of tire city council, and the decision of the judge of the district court on certiorari, are in all things tic same as in the case of Enderson v. Hildebrand, ante, 533, decided at this term, and which decision governs and controls the decision in this case. The decision of the lower court on certiorari is in all things affirmed.

hbtstiaNsoN, Oh. J., and Birukeel, JoiiNsoN, and Nuessue, JL, concur.

Wishek v. Hildenbrand, 204 N.W. 364, 52 N.D. 672, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 135 (N.D. 1925).

Pincite

204 N.W. 364 (Wishek v. Hildenbrand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.