Wise v. Usry

33 N.W. 371, 72 Iowa 74
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 18, 1887·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Reed, J.

The evidence offered and introduced on the trial was taken down in short-hand by the reporter, and at the end of the trial the judge of the circuit court before whom the cause was tried attached his certificate to the short-hand notes, to the effect that they contained all of' the evidence offered or introduced by the parties. The notes were filed by the clerk, but they were not extended or certified to by the reporter until after the expiration of six months from the trial. On this state of the record, the cause cannot be tried de novo in this court. Merrill v. Bowe, 69 Iowa, 653. Appellant, however, has filed an assignment of errors, and we are asked to consider the cause as an ordinary action, and determine the questions raised by the assignment. But the assignment of errors was not filed until after the adjournment of the term to which the appeal was taken, nor until after appellee’s argument was filed. It therefore came too late, and we cannot consider the questions attempted to be raised by it. Russell v. Johnston, 67 Iowa, 279.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wise v. Usry, 33 N.W. 371, 72 Iowa 74 (iowa 1887).

33 N.W. 371 (Wise v. Usry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dwyer v. Rock
87 N.W. 495 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1901)
Calef v. Cole
62 N.W. 24 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1895)
Yetzer v. Wiles
59 N.W. 287 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1894)