Wise v. Usry
This text of 33 N.W. 371 (Wise v. Usry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence offered and introduced on the trial was taken down in short-hand by the reporter, and at the end of the trial the judge of the circuit court before whom the cause was tried attached his certificate to the short-hand notes, to the effect that they contained all of' the evidence offered or introduced by the parties. The notes were filed by the clerk, but they were not extended or certified to by the reporter until after the expiration of six months from the trial. On this state of the record, the cause cannot be tried de novo in this court. Merrill v. Bowe, 69 Iowa, 653. Appellant, however, has filed an assignment of errors, and we are asked to consider the cause as an ordinary action, and determine the questions raised by the assignment. But the assignment of errors was not filed until after the adjournment of the term to which the appeal was taken, nor until after appellee’s argument was filed. It therefore came too late, and we cannot consider the questions attempted to be raised by it. Russell v. Johnston, 67 Iowa, 279.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 N.W. 371, 72 Iowa 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wise-v-usry-iowa-1887.