Wise v. United States Department of Agriculture

592 F. App'x 203
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2015·No. No. 14-1947·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district court’s orders denying them motion for an eviden-tiary hearing and granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wise v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00234-BO, 2014 WL 5460606 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2014; Aug. 19, 2014). We grant Appellants leave to proceed in forma pau-peris but deny their other pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wise v. United States Department of Agriculture, 592 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2015).

592 F. App'x 203 (Wise v. United States Department of Agriculture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pigford v. Veneman
District of Columbia, 2016
Wise v. United States
128 F. Supp. 3d 311 (District of Columbia, 2015)