Wise v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2010·No. 09-7839·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7839

GARY L. WISE, a/k/a Gary Legrande Wise,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., individually and in their official capacities; KAYE G. HEARN, Chief Judge; KENNETH A. RICHSTAD, Clerk; V. CLAIR ALLEN, Deputy Clerk; BRUCE H. WILLIAMS, Judge; J. CURETON, Judge; JEAN H. TOAL, Chief Justice; JOHN H. WALLER, JR., Justice; JAMES E. MOORE, Justice; E. C. BURNETT, III, Justice; COSTA M. PLEICONES, Justice, individually and in their official capacities,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

ANGELA BROWN, DHO Captain; A. GOODEN, Officer; KENNETH SHARP,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:09-cv-01376-HFF)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary L. Wise, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Gary L. Wise appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his

claims against Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006)

review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

Wise v. United States, 6:09-cv-01376-HFF (D.S.C.

Sept. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wise v. United States, (4th Cir. 2010).

Wise v. United States (Wise v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A