Wise v. State
This text of 140 S.W. 1085 (Wise v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From a conviction for unlawfully carrying a pistol on and about his person, the appellant appeals and claims several errors in the proceedings.
The State contends that as the statement of facts was filed more than twenty days after the adjournment of court, notwithstanding the court allowed thirty days for that purpose, that the statement of facts can not be considered, and cites us to Misso v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep., 241, 135 S. W., 1173; Sullivan v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 410, 137 S. W., 700, and Mosher v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 42, 136 S. W., 467. These authorities are in point and we can not consider the statement of facts.
Appellant' raises no question that can be considered without a statement -of the facts.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.W. 1085, 63 Tex. Crim. 618, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wise-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.