Wise v. State
This text of 346 S.E.2d 393 (Wise v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of rape and appeals on several grounds, including violation of his constitutional rights through the prejudicial striking of all black jurors through the use of peremptory challenges.
In this case appellant made timely objection to removal of all black persons on the venire by the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges. Because the trial court rejected the objection without requiring the prosecutor to give an explanation for his actions, we remand the case for further proceedings pursuant to the principles enunciated in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. _ (106 SC 1712, 90 LE2d 69) (1986). The trial court will determine as a matter of fact if the prosecutor challenged the potential jurors solely on account of their race or on the assumption that black jurors as a group will be unable impartially to consider the State’s case against a black defendant, or if the prosecutor has a neutral explanation for his action.
Case remanded with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
346 S.E.2d 393, 179 Ga. App. 115, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 2597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wise-v-state-gactapp-1986.