Wise v. State

265 S.E.2d 78, 153 Ga. App. 175, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 1730
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 24, 1980·No. 59101·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for armed robbery. Held:

The sole enumeration is that evidence of a subsequent robbery by defendant was erroneously admitted, placing his character in issue.

Defendant’s co-defendant’s appeal was decided by this court in Askew v. State, 145 Ga. App. 164 (243 SE2d 334), in which the same enumeration was considered. The holding was that "[T]he evidence of the independent robbery committed on November 20,. 1976 in Carroll [176]*176County was admissible as it tended to show identity and common scheme or plan. Hamilton v. State, 239 Ga. 72 (235 SE2d 515).” Id. at 165. Our examination of the same transcript of evidence reveals no basis for arriving at a different result in this case.

Submitted January 7, 1979 Decided January 24, 1980. Robert Benham, for appellant. William A. Foster, HI, District Attorney, Barbara V. Tinsley, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Carley, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wise v. State, 265 S.E.2d 78, 153 Ga. App. 175, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 1730 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

265 S.E.2d 78 (Wise v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rakestraw v. State
271 S.E.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)