Wise v. Jackson
This text of 565 So. 2d 96 (Wise v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leslie D. Wise appeals from the dismissal, after an ore tenus hearing by the probate court, of her motion to determine heirship in connection with the estate of Edward R. Gayles. Specifically, Wise sought a determination that she was the natural child of Gayles.
The judgment is due to be affirmed on the authority of Winston v. Morrisette, 203 Ala. 76, 82 So. 135 (1919) (ore tenus findings by probate court, where petitioner’s legitimacy was at issue, are not disturbed on appeal unless plainly contrary to the great weight of the evidence), and Davis v. Davis, 278 Ala. 328, 178 So.2d 154 (1965) (ore tenus judgment by the probate court is not disturbed unless palpably erroneous). See, also, Humphries v. Whiteley, 565 So.2d 96 (Ala.1990) (trial court’s judgment following ore tenus hearing will be affirmed if supported by “any credible evidence”).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
565 So. 2d 96, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 393, 1990 WL 90480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wise-v-jackson-ala-1990.