Wise v. Floyd

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6714

GARY L. WISE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HENRY F. FLOYD, Judge; CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE, Judge; WILLIAM M. CATOE, JR., Judge,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:09-cv-00454-HMH)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary L. Wise, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gary L. Wise appeals the district court's order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his

claims against Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006)

review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Wise

v. Floyd, 8:09-cv-00454-HMH (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED