Wise v. Brooks

69 Miss. 891
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 69 Miss. 891 (Wise v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wise v. Brooks, 69 Miss. 891 (Mich. 1892).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe bill makes a very proper case for tbe remedial power of a court of chancery, wbicb may, in proper cases, rectify mistakes either in sheriffs’ deeds or court proceedings, but, unfortunately for the complainants, they have failed to maintain their bill by sufficient evidence. It is doubtless true that, but for misapprehension as to the extent of the operation of the deed to Bowe, the parties would have proceeded differently; but that is not the question for equity to consider in a proceeding to reform contracts. It is not what the'parties would have intended if they had known better, but what did they intend at the time, informed as they were.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliott v. Daves
170 So. 680 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Russell v. Shell Petroleum Corporation
66 F.2d 864 (Tenth Circuit, 1933)
Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. Robertson
92 So. 289 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
Langston v. Langston
93 S.E. 892 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Pittsburg Lumber Co. v. Shell
136 Tenn. 466 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1916)
Frost v. Reagon
1912 OK 352 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Hughes v. Payne
130 N.W. 81 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Miss. 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wise-v-brooks-miss-1892.