Wisdon v. Wisdon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Wisdon v. Wisdon

125 N.E.2d 747, 97 Ohio App. 357, 56 Ohio Op. 126, 1954 Ohio App. LEXIS 712

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 12, 1954

Docket7923

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 N.E.2d 747 (Wisdon v. Wisdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wisdon v. Wisdon, 125 N.E.2d 747, 97 Ohio App. 357, 56 Ohio Op. 126, 1954 Ohio App. LEXIS 712 (Ohio Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Ross, J.

The appeal herein upon questions of law, to which a motion to dismiss has been addressed, ts from an order of the Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, granting alimony pendente lite and an order overruling a motion for rehearing.

The basis for the motion to dismiss the appeal is that the orders appealed from are not final orders. It has been held that an order for alimony pendente lite is not a final order. McMahon v. McMahon, 156 Ohio St., 280, 102 N. E. (2d), 252.

It is claimed by defendant that such an order may not be made if the marriage of the parties is disputed. Certainly, this would be a triable issue, and the order may be made pending the trial.

If the motion for rehearing may be stamped with the status of a motion for new trial, which we do not hold, no abuse of discretion appears in the overruling of the motion, which is a necessary precedent to a consideration of the order of the court on appeal.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Motion granted.

Matthews, P. J., and Hildebrant, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI