Wisdom v. Williams
This text of 30 F. Cas. 386 (Wisdom v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A plea puis darrein continuance admits the plaintiff’s cause of action, and even if the plea is established still the plaintiff is entitled to costs. It has the effect of displacing all other pleas and previous defences, and .the party is obliged to stand on that alone. 10 Wend. 679; 1 Chit. Pl. 441; [Bank of U. S. v. Carneal] 2 Pet. [27 U. S.] 548; Stephen, Pl. 81, 83; [Wallace v. M’Connell] 13 Pet. [38 U. S.] 152; Story, Pl. 53, 54. By operation of law the previous pleas are considered as stricken from the record, and every thing is confessed except the matter contested by the plea puis darrein continuance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F. Cas. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wisdom-v-williams-circtdar-1846.