Wisdom v. Williams

30 F. Cas. 386
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas
DecidedApril 15, 1846
StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. Cas. 386 (Wisdom v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wisdom v. Williams, 30 F. Cas. 386 (circtdar 1846).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

(JOHNSON, District Judge).

A plea puis darrein continuance admits the plaintiff’s cause of action, and even if the plea is established still the plaintiff is entitled to costs. It has the effect of displacing all other pleas and previous defences, and .the party is obliged to stand on that alone. 10 Wend. 679; 1 Chit. Pl. 441; [Bank of U. S. v. Carneal] 2 Pet. [27 U. S.] 548; Stephen, Pl. 81, 83; [Wallace v. M’Connell] 13 Pet. [38 U. S.] 152; Story, Pl. 53, 54. By operation of law the previous pleas are considered as stricken from the record, and every thing is confessed except the matter contested by the plea puis darrein continuance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wisdom-v-williams-circtdar-1846.