Wisdom v. Texas Co.

27 F. Supp. 992, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2782
District Court, N.D. Alabama·Decided April 13, 1939·No. 4947·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

MURPHREE, District Judge.

This cause coming on to be heard on a pre-trial hearing ordered by the Court, the attorneys of record of both parties having been notified in writing in advance of said hearing, the plaintiff failing to appear at said hearing, and the defendant herein having thereupon made a motion that this action be dismissed for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute the action and for failure of the plaintiff to comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States, all in accordance with Rule 41(b) of said rules, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; the same having been considered and understood by the Court:

It is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that this cause is dismissed for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute the action and for failure of plaintiff to comply with said Rules of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wisdom v. Texas Co., 27 F. Supp. 992, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2782 (N.D. Ala. 1939).

27 F. Supp. 992 (Wisdom v. Texas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yannitelli v. Navieras de Puerto Rico
106 F.R.D. 42 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Yacub v. Coughlin
105 F.R.D. 152 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Stafford v. Dickison
374 P.2d 665 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1962)
William Link v. Wabash Railroad Company
291 F.2d 542 (Seventh Circuit, 1961)
Package MacHinery Co. v. HAYSSEN MANUFACTURING CO.
164 F. Supp. 904 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1958)
Nyberg v. Cambridge State Bank
72 N.W.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1955)
Anguiano v. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.
263 P.2d 305 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1953)
Taylor v. Yellow Cab Co. of D. C., Inc.
53 A.2d 691 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1947)