Wisdom v. Rutledge
203 S.W.3d 753, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1538, 2006 WL 2947302
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph Wisdom appeals from the trial court’s judgment of paternity. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wisdom v. Rutledge, 203 S.W.3d 753, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1538, 2006 WL 2947302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
203 S.W.3d 753 (Wisdom v. Rutledge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.