Wiscovitch v. Lend Lease (U.S.) Construction LMB Inc.
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1968 (Wiscovitch v. Lend Lease (U.S.) Construction LMB Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered December 9, 2015, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as abandoned, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing the complaint as abandoned (see CPLR 3215). Plaintiff did not establish a viable excuse for the delay in moving for a default judgment against defendants, nor demonstrate a meritorious cause of action (see Utak v Commerce Bank Inc., 88 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2011]). Any indeterminate extensions of time to answer the complaint ended by March 17, 2014, more than a year before the motion, after plaintiff wrote to defendants asking defendant LIC Site B2 Owner, L.L.C. to answer within two weeks, and informing defendant Lend Lease (U.S.) Construction LMB Inc. that it was in default (see Zenzillo v Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 78 AD3d 1540 [4th Dept 2010]). Furthermore, the excerpt of deposition testimony given by plaintiff in another action, which merely reflects that he sustained a work-related injury at a construction site, for which one of the defendants was a general contractor, does not establish a meritorious claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 1968, 148 A.D.3d 520, 48 N.Y.S.3d 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiscovitch-v-lend-lease-us-construction-lmb-inc-nyappdiv-2017.