Wisconsin Professional Police Ass'n v. Lightbourn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Wisconsin Professional Police Ass'n v. Lightbourn

2000 WI 133, 620 N.W.2d 618, 239 Wis. 2d 768, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 1011

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 28, 2000

DocketNo. 99-3297-OA

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 WI 133 (Wisconsin Professional Police Ass'n v. Lightbourn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wisconsin Professional Police Ass'n v. Lightbourn, 2000 WI 133, 620 N.W.2d 618, 239 Wis. 2d 768, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 1011 (Wis. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶1. On December 29,1999, this court enjoined the Employee Trust Funds Board, the Department of Employee Trust Funds, and Eric Stanchfield, Secretary of the Department of Employee Trust Funds, as well as all petitioners and respondents in this matter, from implementing or enforcing 1999 Wisconsin Act 11 and 1999 Wisconsin Act 12 until further order of this court. The court thereafter granted [769]*769leave to commence an original action. The original action was briefed by the parties and argued before this court on October 4, 2000.

¶ 2. On December 20,2000, respondents Wisconsin Education Association Council et al. (WEAC) moved this court for relief pending final disposition of the appeal. Specifically, WEAC asked this court to dissolve the preliminary injunction with respect to four sections of 1999 Wisconsin Act 11, namely, Sections 12, 14, 25, and 26.

¶ 3. On December 23, 2000, this court ordered petitioners Wisconsin Professional Police Association, Inc. et al. and State Engineering Association et al. and respondents George Lightboum et al. to respond to the WEAC motion by noon on December 27, 2000. They have done so, and objections have been set forth to each aspect of WEAC's motion.

¶ 4. We have carefully examined the motion for interim relief and the responses thereto, as well as the additional filing by WEAC, and we deny the motion. The moving party has not established grounds for granting the motion.

By the Court. — The motion is deified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

¶1. On December 29,1999, this court enjoined the Employee Trust Funds Board, the Department of Employee Trust Funds, and Eric Stanchfield, Secretary of the Department of Employee Trust Funds, as well as all petitioners and respondents in this matter, from implementing or enforcing 1999 Wisconsin Act 11 and 1999 Wisconsin Act 12 until further order of this court. The court thereafter granted [769]*769leave to commence an original action. The original action was briefed by the parties and argued before this court on October 4, 2000.

¶ 2. On December 20,2000, respondents Wisconsin Education Association Council et al. (WEAC) moved this court for relief pending final disposition of the appeal. Specifically, WEAC asked this court to dissolve the preliminary injunction with respect to four sections of 1999 Wisconsin Act 11, namely, Sections 12, 14, 25, and 26.

¶ 3. On December 23, 2000, this court ordered petitioners Wisconsin Professional Police Association, Inc. et al. and State Engineering Association et al. and respondents George Lightboum et al. to respond to the WEAC motion by noon on December 27, 2000. They have done so, and objections have been set forth to each aspect of WEAC's motion.

¶ 4. We have carefully examined the motion for interim relief and the responses thereto, as well as the additional filing by WEAC, and we deny the motion. The moving party has not established grounds for granting the motion.

By the Court. — The motion is deified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 WI 133, 620 N.W.2d 618, 239 Wis. 2d 768, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wisconsin-professional-police-assn-v-lightbourn-wis-2000.