Wisconsin Lime & Cement Co. v. City of Chicago

270 U.S. 626, 46 S. Ct. 206
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 25, 1926·No. No. 141·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Dibble v. Bellingham-Bay Land Co., 163 U. S. 63, 69; Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 200; Henkelv. Cincinnati, 177 U. S. 170, 171; Home for Incurables v. New York, 187 U. S. 155, 158; Fullerton v. Texas, 196 U. S. 192, 194; Marvin v. Trout, 199 U. S. 212, 223; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596. Messrs. James W. Good, Robert W. Childs, Dwight L. Bobh, James B, Wescott, Delbert A. Clithero, and F. M.'Hartman for plaintiff in error, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wisconsin Lime & Cement Co. v. City of Chicago, 270 U.S. 626, 46 S. Ct. 206 (1926).

270 U.S. 626 (Wisconsin Lime & Cement Co. v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Co.
163 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Dewey v. Des Moines
173 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Home for Incurables v. City of New York
187 U.S. 155 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Marvin v. Trout
199 U.S. 212 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Fullerton v. Texas
196 U.S. 192 (Supreme Court, 1905)