Wisconsin E. R. Board v. J. P. Cullen Son

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Wisconsin E. R. Board v. J. P. Cullen Son

33 N.W.2d 184, 253 Wis. 109, 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 345, 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2383

DecidedMay 27, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 33 N.W.2d 184 (Wisconsin E. R. Board v. J. P. Cullen Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wisconsin E. R. Board v. J. P. Cullen Son, 33 N.W.2d 184, 253 Wis. 109, 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 345, 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2383 (Wis. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Case ruled by Wisconsin E. R. Board v. Cullen, ante, p. 105. Petition by the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, appellant, for enforcement of an order entered by it pursuant to sec.111.07, Stats., against J. P. Cullen Son, a copartnership, respondent, for an unfair labor practice. The court granted summary judgment dismissing the petition. The facts will be stated in the opinion. This is a companion case to Wisconsin E.R. Board v. J. P. Cullen Son, wherein Clarence Allard applied to the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board for redress. In this action Robert Schroeder was employed by respondent as a laborer on the Marinette project on September 12, 1946, and was later discharged. The board found the termination of his services was an unfair labor practice and entered a cease-and-desist order and directed notices to be posted by respondent and the employee reimbursed for his loss of wages. The procedure thereafter was the same as the Allard case. This case was argued and submitted with the case of Wisconsin E. R. Board v. J. P. Cullen Son,ante, p. 105, 33 N.W.2d 182, and is ruled by the decision therein.

Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

MARTIN, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case ruled by Wisconsin E. R. Board v. Cullen, ante, p. 105. Petition by the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, appellant, for enforcement of an order entered by it pursuant to sec.111.07, Stats., against J. P. Cullen Son, a copartnership, respondent, for an unfair labor practice. The court granted summary judgment dismissing the petition. The facts will be stated in the opinion. This is a companion case to Wisconsin E.R. Board v. J. P. Cullen Son, wherein Clarence Allard applied to the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board for redress. In this action Robert Schroeder was employed by respondent as a laborer on the Marinette project on September 12, 1946, and was later discharged. The board found the termination of his services was an unfair labor practice and entered a cease-and-desist order and directed notices to be posted by respondent and the employee reimbursed for his loss of wages. The procedure thereafter was the same as the Allard case. This case was argued and submitted with the case of Wisconsin E. R. Board v. J. P. Cullen Son,ante, p. 105, 33 N.W.2d 182, and is ruled by the decision therein.

Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

MARTIN, J., took no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.W.2d 184, 253 Wis. 109, 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 345, 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wisconsin-e-r-board-v-j-p-cullen-son-wis-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack