Wisch Leasing Group, LP v. the Woodlands Land Development Company, LP, Dream Motors, LLC, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 24, 2019
Docket09-18-00461-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Wisch Leasing Group, LP v. the Woodlands Land Development Company, LP, Dream Motors, LLC, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC (Wisch Leasing Group, LP v. the Woodlands Land Development Company, LP, Dream Motors, LLC, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wisch Leasing Group, LP v. the Woodlands Land Development Company, LP, Dream Motors, LLC, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-18-00461-CV _________________

WISCH LEASING GROUP, LP, Appellant

V.

THE WOODLANDS LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LP, DREAM MOTORS, LLC, AND MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES USA, LLC, Appellees ________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-09-10958-CV ________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Wisch Leasing Group, LP filed notices of appeal from orders signed by the

trial court on October 31 and November 1, 2018. We questioned whether the orders

are appealable at this time. The Woodlands Land Development Company, LP,

Dream Motors, LLC, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC filed

motions to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because unresolved claims 1 remain before the trial court and the orders are not subject to an accelerated appeal.

The appellant filed a response but failed to show that an appeal is available at this

time.

Generally, appellate courts review only final judgments and interlocutory

orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39

S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The trial court has not authorized a permissive appeal

and there is no indication that a final judgment is imminent. Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice

Submitted on January 23, 2019 Opinion Delivered January 24, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wisch Leasing Group, LP v. the Woodlands Land Development Company, LP, Dream Motors, LLC, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wisch-leasing-group-lp-v-the-woodlands-land-development-company-lp-texapp-2019.