Wirth v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
194 A. 143, 119 N.J.L. 25, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 237
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wirth v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, 194 A. 143, 119 N.J.L. 25, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1937).
194 A. 143 (Wirth v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Payne v. Louisville Ry. Co.
171 S.W.2d 253 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1943)