Wirth v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
194 A. 143, 119 N.J.L. 25, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 237
This text of 194 A. 143 (Wirth v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wirth v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, 194 A. 143, 119 N.J.L. 25, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1937).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Payne v. Louisville Ry. Co.
171 S.W.2d 253 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 A. 143, 119 N.J.L. 25, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wirth-v-hudson-manhattan-railroad-nj-1937.