Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. Wirth

193 N.E. 296, 265 N.Y. 510, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1122
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. Wirth. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 N.Y. 214
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 9, 1934·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, without costs.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding the following provision thereto: “ The defendant Monheimer is directed to continue to hold in his possession any moneys paid to him upon the notes referred to in the contract pending the entry of judgment upon the finding of the referee, and he is further directed to pay over to the plaintiffs the amount of the judgment, if any, entered on such findings, out of the moneys so held by him; except that before the entry of such judgment the defendant Monheimer may pay to the plaintiffs costs awarded to them.” (See 265 N. Y. 214.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. Wirth, 193 N.E. 296, 265 N.Y. 510, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1122 (N.Y. 1934).

193 N.E. 296 (Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. Wirth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. Wirth
192 N.E. 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)