Wirth (Charles) Vs. The Eleventh Jud. Dist. Ct.

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: January 22, 2020
• Docket: 80315
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHARLES MATTHEW WIRTH, No. 80315 Petitioner, vs. THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PERSHING, Respondent.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

In this original petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner seeks an order directing the district court to resolve all pending matters in two different district court cases. Petitioner contends the district court's inaction is preventing him from pursuing appellate relief. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88

SUPREME COUR OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 40D oSOOP P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.1

, C.J.

J. , J. Hardesty Cadish

cc: Charles•Matthew Wirth Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk

1We are confident that the district court will resolve all pending matters as expeditiously as its calendar permits.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 40005, 2 t.