Wirsching v. Grand Lodge of Free & Accepted Masons
63 A. 1119, 67 N.J. Eq. 711, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 218
Opinion
The decree in the above cause is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Dixon, Foet, Pitney, Swayze, Vredenburgh — 6.
For reversal — Garrison, Vroom, Green, Gray — 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wirsching v. Grand Lodge of Free & Accepted Masons, 63 A. 1119, 67 N.J. Eq. 711, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 218 (N.J. 1905).
63 A. 1119 (Wirsching v. Grand Lodge of Free & Accepted Masons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hamel v. Allstate Ins. Co.
559 A.2d 455 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
Panco v. Rogers
87 A.2d 770 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Conduit Found. Corp. v. City of Atlantic City
64 A.2d 382 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Miller v. Stanich
230 N.W. 47 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1930)
John A. Cozzone Co. v. Redfield
129 A. 699 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)