Home/Supreme Court/Wirl Television Corp. v. United States

Wirl Television Corp. v. United States

358 U.S. 51, 79 S. Ct. 94, 3 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1918
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 20, 1958·No. 242·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for appropriate action in the light of the matter called to this Court’s attention on page 7 of the Solicitor General’s brief in No. 235, Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States et al., ante, p. 49.

[For dissent of Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan, see ante, p. 50.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wirl Television Corp. v. United States, 358 U.S. 51, 79 S. Ct. 94, 3 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1918 (1958).

358 U.S. 51 (Wirl Television Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fort Harrison Telecasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Illiana Telecasting Corporation, Wabash Valley Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenors. 220 Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Signal Hill Telecastingcorporation, Intervenors. Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Signal Hill Telecasting Corporation, Illiana Telecasting Corporation, Americanbroadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Plains Television Corporation, 220television,inc., the State of Illinois, Metromedia, Inc., Intervenors
324 F.2d 379 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
Fort Harrison Telecasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
324 F.2d 379 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
Wirl Television Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Tele-Views News Co., American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Intervenors, Illiway Television, Inc., Intervenor, Hilltop Broadcasting Co., Intervenor, Wmbd, Inc., Intervenor, West Central Broadcasting Co., Intervenor. Wirl Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Wmbd, Inc., Intervenor, Tele-Views News Co., Intervenor, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Intervenor, Hilltop Broadcasting Company, Intervenor, Illiway Television, Inc., Intervenor, West Central Broadcasting Company, Intervenor (Two Cases)
274 F.2d 83 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
Owensboro on the Air, Inc., and Owensboro Publishing Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Intervenor, Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenor, Weht, Inc., Intervenor. Owensboro on the Air, Inc., and Owensboro Publishing Company v. Federal Communications Commission, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Intervenor, Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenor. Owensboro on the Air, Inc., and Owensboro Publishing Company v. Federal Communications Commission, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Intervenor, Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenor, Weht, Inc., Intervenor. Evansville Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Weht, Inc., Intervenor. Evansville Television, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Weht, Inc., Intervenor. Owensboro on the Air, Inc., and Owensboro Publishing Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Intervenor, Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenor, Weht, Inc., Intervenor
262 F.2d 702 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
Owensboro on the Air, Inc. v. United States
262 F.2d 702 (D.C. Circuit, 1958)
Tennessee Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Wbir, Inc., Intervenor
262 F.2d 28 (D.C. Circuit, 1958)