Wiren v. Long Island Railroad
This text of 222 A.D. 812 (Wiren v. Long Island Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law, on argument, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. This court again disapproves of the practice of dismissing complaints on the pleadings and the opening of counsel except where it appears beyond doubt that no question of fact is involved. Here questions of fact were presented. If there were a variance between pleading and statement, plaintiff’s effort toward amendment should have been heeded. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiren-v-long-island-railroad-nyappdiv-1928.