Wire Rope Importers' Ass'n v. United States

17 Ct. Int'l Trade 1092
United States Court of International Trade·Decided September 27, 1993·No. Court No. 93-04-00221·Published

Opinion

Opinion and Order

DiCarlo, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff brought this action under 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(1988) by filing a summons on April 22, 1993, within 30 days after the publication of a final affirmative determination by the International Trade Commission in the investigation of Steel Wire Rope from the Republic of Korea and Mexico, 58 Fed. Reg. 16,206 (March 25, 1993). Plaintiff filed its complaint on May 26, 1993, 34 days after the filing of the summons. Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the complaint was not filed within 30 days of the filing of the summons as required by 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2).

It is well settled under the court decisions in Georgetown Steel Corp. v. United States, 4 Fed. Cir. (T) 143, 801 F.2d 1308 (1986), and Pistachio Group of Ass’n of Food Indus., Inc. v. United States, 11 CIT 537, 667 F. Supp. 886 (1987), that this court lacks jurisdiction where the complaint in an action brought under 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2) is filed more than 30 days after the filing of the summons. Plaintiff has presented no valid argument distinguishing this case from the above-cited cases.

Accordingly, it is hereby

Ordered that defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and it is further

Ordered that the action is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wire Rope Importers' Ass'n v. United States, 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 1092 (cit 1993).

17 Ct. Int'l Trade 1092 (Wire Rope Importers' Ass'n v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgetown Steel Corporation v. The United States
801 F.2d 1308 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Pistachio Group of Ass'n of the Food Industries, Inc. v. United States
667 F. Supp. 886 (Court of International Trade, 1987)