Wippel v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n

259 So. 3d 314
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 2018·No. No. 1D17-4912·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*315Wippel filed an appeal to the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission (RAAC) after he received two contradictory notifications concerning his application for reemployment assistance. RAAC dismissed the appeal as untimely, and Wippel now appeals that dismissal. RAAC concedes error, stating that it should not have dismissed the appeal if it was untimely due to overlapping agency orders. We accept this concession, and remand for a determination as to whether Wippel filed a belated appeal to RAAC due to confusion stemming from these orders. See Ellis v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n , 73 So.3d 887, 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Osterhaus, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wippel v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n, 259 So. 3d 314 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

259 So. 3d 314 (Wippel v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
73 So. 3d 887 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)