Winton's Appeal

5 A. 433, 2 Sadler 83, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 742
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 22, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The appellant has no equity which he can invoke against theappellee. The latter is entitled to the money by virtue of the-[90] priority of his lien. His right thereto cannot be defeated under the agreement set up by the appellant as made with a former owner of the judgment. No actual or constructive notice of the agreement was given to the appellee. He bought the judgment relying on the record. If one of two innocent persons must suffer, the loss must fall on the appellant whose omission to give the notice has caused his loss.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winton's Appeal, 5 A. 433, 2 Sadler 83, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 742 (Pa. 1886).

5 A. 433 (Winton's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulf Refining Co. v. Camp Curtin Trust Co.
187 A. 437 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Arch Street Building & Loan Assn. v. Sook
158 A. 595 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)