Winton v. . Winton
22 N.E. 379, 117 N.Y. 623, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1471
Opinion
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Peckham, J., who reads for reversal, Danforth, J., concurring, and Ruger, Ch. J., not voting.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winton v. . Winton, 22 N.E. 379, 117 N.Y. 623, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1471 (N.Y. 1889).
22 N.E. 379 (Winton v. . Winton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maran v. Maran
137 A.D. 348 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)