Winton v. Cagliostro

Washington Supreme Court

Winton v. Cagliostro

441 P.3d 1192, 193 Wash. 2d 1013

Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 2019·No. No. 96387-8·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion for declaratory judgment and motions for sanctions are also denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion for declaratory judgment and motions for sanctions are also denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Winton v. Cagliostro, 441 P.3d 1192, 193 Wash. 2d 1013 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

441 P.3d 1192 (Winton v. Cagliostro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.