Winton v. Amos

56 Ct. Cl. 472, 51 Ct. Cl. 284

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 7, 1921·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice PitNey

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court March 7, 1921.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winton v. Amos, 56 Ct. Cl. 472, 51 Ct. Cl. 284 (U.S. 1921).

Pincite

56 Ct. Cl. 472 (Winton v. Amos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bryant

579 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Greene v. Impson

530 F. App'x 777 (Tenth Circuit, 2013)

Rein v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

443 F. App'x 612 (Second Circuit, 2011)

State v. Abrahamson

238 P.3d 533 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2010)

United States v. Frank Long

324 F.3d 475 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)

Hawes v. Colorado Division of Insurance

65 P.3d 1008 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2003)

Dwight E. Wininger, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Charlene E. Sutherland Gary T. Charlebois Joel M. Boyden M. Frances Donovan Charles F. Odenbach Pedro P. Ponce Randy Price John Pullen Gregory Stoia, Intervenors-Appellants v. Si Management L.P., a Limited Partnership, Dwight E. Wininger, Charlene E. Sutherland Gary T. Charlebois, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated Joel M. Boyden M. Frances Donovan Charles F. Odenbach Pedro P. Ponce Randy Price John Pullen Gregory Stoia, Intervenors-Appellees v. Si Management L.P., a Limited Partnership, Dwight E. Wininger, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Charlene E. Sutherland Gary T. Charlebois Spiegel Liao & Kagay Joel M. Boyden M. Frances Donovan Charles F. Odenbach Pedro P. Ponce Randy Price John Pullen Gregory Stoia, Intervenors-Appellants v. Si Management L.P., a Limited Partnership

301 F.3d 1115 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Wininger v. SI Management L.P.

301 F.3d 1115 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Choctaw Nation v. United States

81 Ct. Cl. 1 (Court of Claims, 1935)

McMurray v. Choctaw Nation of Indians

62 Ct. Cl. 458 (Court of Claims, 1926)