Winther v. Railroad Maintenance Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Winther v. Railroad Maintenance Corp.

169 A.D.2d 591, 564 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 591

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 169 A.D.2d 591 (Winther v. Railroad Maintenance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winther v. Railroad Maintenance Corp., 169 A.D.2d 591, 564 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Philip C. Modesto, J.), entered October 6, 1989, after a jury trial, which, inter alia, awarded plaintiff Charles Winther judgment as against defendant Railroad Maintenance Corporation (RMC) in the reduced sum of $345,000, plus costs and disbursements, and which adjudged that third-party defendant New York City Transit Authority have judgment as against defendant RMC, dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff Charles Winther was injured on January 3, 1985 when, while working as a trackman for his employer, third-party defendant New York City Transit Authority, a subway rail being lifted by a crane, owned by defendant RMC, fell onto the plaintiff’s leg.

Upon examination of the record, we conclude that the jury’s finding that the crane operator was not a "special employee” of the Transit Authority was properly submitted to and resolved by the jury, and was supported by the evidence adduced at trial. (Brooks v Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, 71 AD2d 405.) Similarly, we find that sufficient evidence was adduced at trial to support the jury’s finding that defendant RMC was vicariously liable for the crane operator’s negligence under the doctrine of respondeat superior. (State Div. of Human Rights v GTE Corp., 109 AD2d 1082.)

Finally, the trial court’s reduction of the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff from $1,395,000 to $345,000 was also supported by the record, which reveals that the jury award for plaintiff’s injuries, including a fractured tibia and fibula which were thereafter set by closed reduction and which subsequently healed except for some arthritic discomfort, was manifestly excessive and unsubstantiated by the evidence adduced at trial. (Cohen v Hallmark Cards,.45 NY2d 493.)

We have considered the remaining contentions raised on appeal and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Philip C. Modesto, J.), entered October 6, 1989, after a jury trial, which, inter alia, awarded plaintiff Charles Winther judgment as against defendant Railroad Maintenance Corporation (RMC) in the reduced sum of $345,000, plus costs and disbursements, and which adjudged that third-party defendant New York City Transit Authority have judgment as against defendant RMC, dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff Charles Winther was injured on January 3, 1985 when, while working as a trackman for his employer, third-party defendant New York City Transit Authority, a subway rail being lifted by a crane, owned by defendant RMC, fell onto the plaintiff’s leg.

Upon examination of the record, we conclude that the jury’s finding that the crane operator was not a "special employee” of the Transit Authority was properly submitted to and resolved by the jury, and was supported by the evidence adduced at trial. (Brooks v Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, 71 AD2d 405.) Similarly, we find that sufficient evidence was adduced at trial to support the jury’s finding that defendant RMC was vicariously liable for the crane operator’s negligence under the doctrine of respondeat superior. (State Div. of Human Rights v GTE Corp., 109 AD2d 1082.)

Finally, the trial court’s reduction of the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff from $1,395,000 to $345,000 was also supported by the record, which reveals that the jury award for plaintiff’s injuries, including a fractured tibia and fibula which were thereafter set by closed reduction and which subsequently healed except for some arthritic discomfort, was manifestly excessive and unsubstantiated by the evidence adduced at trial. (Cohen v Hallmark Cards,.45 NY2d 493.)

We have considered the remaining contentions raised on appeal and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.D.2d 591, 564 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winther-v-railroad-maintenance-corp-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack