Winters v. Winters

1947 OK 246, 184 P.2d 796, 199 Okla. 129, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 607
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 16, 1947
DocketNo. 31886
StatusPublished

This text of 1947 OK 246 (Winters v. Winters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winters v. Winters, 1947 OK 246, 184 P.2d 796, 199 Okla. 129, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 607 (Okla. 1947).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court. On April 17, 1946, she tiled her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause may be reversed and remanded with directions. City of Tulsa v. Cockrell, 195 Okla. 518, 159 P. 2d 711.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the defendant in error and to grant plaintiff in error a new trial.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Tulsa v. Cockrell
1945 OK 191 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1947 OK 246, 184 P.2d 796, 199 Okla. 129, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winters-v-winters-okla-1947.