Winters v. Walton

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana
DecidedMay 4, 2021
Docket3:21-cv-00284
StatusUnknown

This text of Winters v. Walton (Winters v. Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winters v. Walton, (N.D. Ind. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

EMMANUEL A. WINTERS,

Plaintiff,

v. CAUSE NO. 3:21-CV-284-DRL-MGG

WARDEN,

Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER Emmanuel A. Winters, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion for a preliminary injunction alleging that he has been prevented from practicing his Muslim religion because he has been denied religion materials and a Kosher or halal diet in violation of his First Amendment rights.1 ECF 1. However, Mr. Winters has not filed a complaint. In the absence of a complaint, the case has not been commenced properly, and it is impossible for the court to determine if a preliminary injunction is appropriate. “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.” Winter v. NRDC, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). To proceed, Mr. Winters must file a complaint and clearly state who he is suing and why he is suing them. As the instructions on the court’s complaint form explain, Mr.

1 Mr. Winters’s motion is titled “Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.” ECF 1. Winters needs to write a short and plain statement telling what each defendant did wrong. He needs to explain when, where, why, and how each defendant violated his

rights. He needs to include every fact necessary to explain his case and describe his injuries or damages. He needs to use each defendant’s name every time he refers to that defendant. Additionally, Mr. Winters has neither paid the filing fee nor sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Mr. Winters must resolve his filing fee status by either paying the filing fee or filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with a copy of his

inmate trust fund ledger for the past six months as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). For these reasons, the court: (1) DENIES Emmanuel A. Winters’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF 1); (2) DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Complaint Pro Se 14 (INND Rev. 2/20) and a blank Prisoner In Forma Pauperis Motion, AO 240

(Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) and send them to Emmanuel A. Winters; (3) GRANTS Emmanuel A. Winters until May 31, 2021, to file a complaint and resolve his filing fee status; and (4) CAUTIONS Emmanuel A. Winters that, if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice.

SO ORDERED. May 4, 2021 s/ Damon R. Leichty Judge, United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Winters v. Walton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winters-v-walton-innd-2021.