Winters v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Winters v. State

569 S.W.3d 28

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 2018

DocketWD 80964

StatusPublished

This text of 569 S.W.3d 28 (Winters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winters v. State, 569 S.W.3d 28 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Ramone Winters appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree burglary, kidnapping, two counts of forcible rape, and seven counts of forcible sodomy. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the denial of post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reason for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Ramone Winters appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree burglary, kidnapping, two counts of forcible rape, and seven counts of forcible sodomy. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the denial of post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reason for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

569 S.W.3d 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winters-v-state-moctapp-2018.