Winters v. Cricket Club
This text of 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 134 (Winters v. Cricket Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The trial judge erroneously determined that Appellant was not entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1983). It is clear from a review of the record that no justiciable issues existed as to Appellant, Defendant below. Appellee’s suit initiated against Appellant was sham and frivolous. We reverse and [135]*135remand for a determination of the amount of legal fees to be awarded Appellant for services in the trial court. We deny the motion for legal fees concerning this Appeal.
Reversed and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Fla. Supp. 2d 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winters-v-cricket-club-flacirct-1986.