Winters v. Cricket Club

20 Fla. Supp. 2d 134
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedDecember 12, 1986
DocketCase No. 85-303 AP
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 134 (Winters v. Cricket Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winters v. Cricket Club, 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 134 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge erroneously determined that Appellant was not entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1983). It is clear from a review of the record that no justiciable issues existed as to Appellant, Defendant below. Appellee’s suit initiated against Appellant was sham and frivolous. We reverse and [135]*135remand for a determination of the amount of legal fees to be awarded Appellant for services in the trial court. We deny the motion for legal fees concerning this Appeal.

Reversed and Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Fla. Supp. 2d 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winters-v-cricket-club-flacirct-1986.