Winters Livestock v. Kroll

914 P.2d 660, 1996 WL 98184
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 4, 1996
DocketNo. 86399
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 914 P.2d 660 (Winters Livestock v. Kroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winters Livestock v. Kroll, 914 P.2d 660, 1996 WL 98184 (Okla. 1996).

Opinion

[661]*661 CORRECTED ORDER

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied and this review proceeding may go forward. An order directing the employer or his insurance carrier to pay all reasonable and necessary medical expenses is reviewable because medical treatment is an allowance in the nature of compensation. Williams v. Central Dairy Products Company, 205 Okl. 266, 236 P.2d 984 (1951), Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. Gillum, 774 P.2d 1063 (Okl.1989). A reviewable order of the Workers’ Compensation Court is one which either grants or denies an award of compensation or otherwise constitutes a final determination of the rights between the parties. Toney v. Parker Drilling Co., 640 P.2d 1356 (Okl.1982).

ALMA WILSON, C.J., KAUGER, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arrow Tool & Gauge v. Mead
2000 OK 86 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 P.2d 660, 1996 WL 98184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winters-livestock-v-kroll-okla-1996.