Winters Livestock v. Kroll

914 P.2d 660, 1996 WL 98184
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 4, 1996·No. No. 86399·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[661] CORRECTED ORDER

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied and this review proceeding may go forward. An order directing the employer or his insurance carrier to pay all reasonable and necessary medical expenses is reviewable because medical treatment is an allowance in the nature of compensation. Williams v. Central Dairy Products Company, 205 Okl. 266, 236 P.2d 984 (1951), Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. Gillum, 774 P.2d 1063 (Okl.1989). A reviewable order of the Workers’ Compensation Court is one which either grants or denies an award of compensation or otherwise constitutes a final determination of the rights between the parties. Toney v. Parker Drilling Co., 640 P.2d 1356 (Okl.1982).

ALMA WILSON, C.J., KAUGER, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winters Livestock v. Kroll, 914 P.2d 660, 1996 WL 98184 (Okla. 1996).

914 P.2d 660 (Winters Livestock v. Kroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arrow Tool & Gauge v. Mead
2000 OK 86 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2000)