Winterrowd v. Municipality of Anchorage

139 P.3d 592, 2006 Alas. App. LEXIS 130, 2006 WL 2191994
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Winterrowd v. Municipality of Anchorage. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Alas. App. LEXIS 97
Court of Appeals of Alaska·Decided July 26, 2006·No. No. A-09233, A-09234·Published

Opinion

Order

Petition for Rehearing

Upon consideration of Winterrowd’s petition for rehearing,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Winterrowd declares that he did not produce his vehicle registration during the traffic stop of January 3, 2004. Accordingly, the first sentence of the second paragraph of our decision is amended to read: “During the [593]*593January 3rd traffic stop, Winterrowd produced his driver’s license, but he did not produce his registration or proof of insurance.”

2.In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Entered by the direction of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winterrowd v. Municipality of Anchorage, 139 P.3d 592, 2006 Alas. App. LEXIS 130, 2006 WL 2191994 (Ala. Ct. App. 2006).

139 P.3d 592 (Winterrowd v. Municipality of Anchorage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.