Wintermute v. Hankinson

6 N.J.L. 170
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.J.L. 170 (Wintermute v. Hankinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wintermute v. Hankinson, 6 N.J.L. 170 (N.J. 1822).

Opinion

Kirkpatriok 0. J.

The mere delivery of the writ to the ■constable gives him ru> right to maintain trover. He must make an inventory, and then, only, is he considered as taking possession of the goods of the defendant, and if they are not .actually taken away by the constable they are considered as bailed to the defendant for safe keeping.

Ford J.

I hold that the officer must shew either an actual or constructive possession to enable him to maintain trover. A constructive possession might arise from the defendant’s delivering to the constable an inventory of his goods, or, possibly, from the constable’s being ready to take possession, and being prevented by force.

Rossell J. concurred in the opinions delivered.

Kirkpatrick C. J. Let the judgment be reversed.

J. S. Hoisted, attorney for plaintiff in certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.J.L. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wintermute-v-hankinson-nj-1822.