Winter v. United States Department of Agriculture
This text of 46 F. App'x 580 (Winter v. United States Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Sylvia Winter appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing, for failure to comply with court orders to proceed with discovery, her action alleging that defendant discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s dismissal for failure to comply with a court order, Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Winter’s action because Winter failed to comply with the district court’s orders to participate in discovery. See Hyde & Drath v. Baker, 24 F.3d 1162, 1167 (9th Cir.1994).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 F. App'x 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-v-united-states-department-of-agriculture-ca9-2002.