Winter v. Shankland

3 Tenn. Ch. R. 361
CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedApril 15, 1877
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Tenn. Ch. R. 361 (Winter v. Shankland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winter v. Shankland, 3 Tenn. Ch. R. 361 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1877).

Opinion

The Chancellor :

A scire facias to revive a suit against the personal representatives or heirs of a party who has died [362]*362is in the nature of a notice or summons. The statutes speak, of the process as a scire facias or notice. Code, secs. 2856, 4425. If a bill of revivor were filed, it would simply allege-the death of the party, and an ordinary summons would issue. The death, in that case, would not be proved in advance to authorize the issuance of the writ. Proof is required to work an abatement, not as a prerequisite to the-issuance of pi'ocess to revive. In this case, the order on the rules shows the suggestion and proof of death, and the scire-facias, although inartificially worded, contains all the requisites prescribed by the Code, sec. 4428, — namely, the-names of the parties to the suit, the filing of the bill, pen-dency of the suit, and death of the party. That the latter . is in the form of a suggestion is immaterial. The scire facia# is sufficient, and the motion to quash is disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Tenn. Ch. R. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-v-shankland-tennctapp-1877.