Winter v. Geobner
21 Colo. 279
Opinion
This case is brought here on a writ of error to a judgment of the court of appeals. The facts upon which the controversy arises are fully stated, and the law applicable thereto ably discussed, in the opinion of the court of appeals in Winter v. Goebner, 2 Colo. App. 259. We fully concur in the reasoning of the learned writer of that opinion, and the conclusion reached. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winter v. Geobner, 21 Colo. 279 (Colo. 1895).
21 Colo. 279 (Winter v. Geobner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kimball v. Statler
176 P. 843 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1918)
Mountz v. De Bar
61 Colo. 363 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1916)
Riverside Land & Irrigation Co. v. Sawyer
24 Colo. App. 442 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1913)