Winter v. Doane
315 N.W.2d 262, 210 Neb. 499, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 938
This text of 315 N.W.2d 262 (Winter v. Doane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Winter v. Doane, 315 N.W.2d 262, 210 Neb. 499, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 938 (Neb. 1982).
Opinion
The District Court’s finding of the defendant Doane to be in contempt and its dismissal of his cross-petition as a sanction for failing to answer a deposition question ordered answered by the court was correct and is affirmed. See Campbell v. Lutz, 182 Neb. 27, 152 N.W.2d 101 (1967).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tyler v. Heywood
598 N.W.2d 73 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
315 N.W.2d 262, 210 Neb. 499, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-v-doane-neb-1982.