Winter v. Doane
315 N.W.2d 262, 210 Neb. 499, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 938
Opinion
The District Court’s finding of the defendant Doane to be in contempt and its dismissal of his cross-petition as a sanction for failing to answer a deposition question ordered answered by the court was correct and is affirmed. See Campbell v. Lutz, 182 Neb. 27, 152 N.W.2d 101 (1967).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winter v. Doane, 315 N.W.2d 262, 210 Neb. 499, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 938 (Neb. 1982).
315 N.W.2d 262 (Winter v. Doane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tyler v. Heywood
598 N.W.2d 73 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1999)