Winter v. Colonial Land Co.
This text of 61 Pa. Super. 215 (Winter v. Colonial Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
On the trial before the jury, the question of the effect [220]*220of the defendant’s plea of the statute of limitations, was reserved by the court, and on hearing of a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto it was held to be a bar to the action. We adopt the interpretation of the contract as made by Judge Evans for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by him, and affirm the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Pa. Super. 215, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-v-colonial-land-co-pasuperct-1915.