Winter v. Colonial Land Co.

61 Pa. Super. 215, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 11, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 185
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 Pa. Super. 215 (Winter v. Colonial Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winter v. Colonial Land Co., 61 Pa. Super. 215, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

On the trial before the jury, the question of the effect [220]*220of the defendant’s plea of the statute of limitations, was reserved by the court, and on hearing of a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto it was held to be a bar to the action. We adopt the interpretation of the contract as made by Judge Evans for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by him, and affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lundvall v. Camp Hill School District
58 Pa. D. & C.2d 643 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Stucker v. Shumaker
139 A. 114 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Pa. Super. 215, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-v-colonial-land-co-pasuperct-1915.