Winter v. Colonial Land Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Winter v. Colonial Land Co.

61 Pa. Super. 215, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 11, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 185·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

On the trial before the jury, the question of the effect [220] of the defendant’s plea of the statute of limitations, was reserved by the court, and on hearing of a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto it was held to be a bar to the action. We adopt the interpretation of the contract as made by Judge Evans for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by him, and affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

On the trial before the jury, the question of the effect [220] of the defendant’s plea of the statute of limitations, was reserved by the court, and on hearing of a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto it was held to be a bar to the action. We adopt the interpretation of the contract as made by Judge Evans for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by him, and affirm the judgment.

Winter v. Colonial Land Co., 61 Pa. Super. 215, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

61 Pa. Super. 215 (Winter v. Colonial Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related